![]() Victor replied by asking Matheson if he was aware of the lawsuits initiated by the Local Churches and Witness Lee against other professing Christians who wrote materials critical of Lee’s teachings. Matheson emailed Victor the following information:Ī website about the teachings of Witness Lee:Ī video of Hank Hannegraaff giving the “Christian Research Institute” seal of approval to Witness Lee’s “Local Churches”: Here is the summarized version (click here to read the unabridged correspondence): Victor met a member of Lee’s church in Lethbridge in 2013 and had the following email correspondence about whether theirs was the Lord’s Church. He and Nee set a guideline and established “Local Churches” one per city, because the True Church of God should be unified. Lee believed he was called by God to lead others into “The Lord’s Recovery” of the original and authentic Church in our times. Lee moved to the US in 1962 and was headquartered in California while continuing his evangelical/teaching work worldwide till his death in 1997. He professed faith as a young man and became associated with Watchman Nee. Witness Lee came from an evangelical background in early twentieth century China. They will not be denied their place at man’s table, so they deny the Lord and are refused a place at His. But not Witness Lee and his “Local Church.” They take you to court just if critiqued. It does serve as a good reminder to us to be careful with our words and clear about the doctrine we claim as true.The saints rejoice when persecuted by the religious on account of their faith in Christ. The entire debacle is unfortunate and does not reflect well on Christ's church. The differences between the Western Christian church culture and the Chinese Christian church culture, Lee's inflammatory remarks, critic's knee-jerk reactions, and language barriers, seem to be the root causes for much of the conflict. The New Testament teaches against taking a fellow Christian to court (1 Corinthians 6:1–8). Once again, a careful study of his doctrine found that he did support the biblical church.įourthly, the LC was criticized for repeatedly suing individuals and ministries that challenged it. His broad brush against Christendom caused many to charge him with heresy. A close study of Lee's doctrine, however, reveals that he believes man cannot be worshiped by others and does not share God's Person.Īnother matter of controversy was Lee's criticism of Christianity, the Catholic Church, and all Christian denominations. Man becoming God, evangelicals and orthodoxy teach, is Satan's lie to Eve and Adam in the garden of Eden (Genesis 3:5). Closer scrutiny of his doctrine showed that his view of the Trinity agreed with evangelical orthodoxy.Īt one point, Lee seemed to teach that man could, and should, become god or god-like, even calling God a "four-in-one" God. For example, he called into question the "traditional explanation of the Trinity" which led evangelicals to question his belief in the Trinity. Lee consistently made radical statements then followed them with balancing statements at a later time. The controversy and disagreement focused on four areas of doctrine: the nature of God, the nature of man, the legitimacy of evangelical churches and denominations, and the lawsuits brought by the Local Church against Evangelical churches, publishers, and individuals. Chief among the critics, until 2009, was CRI and its leaders. Lee made statements that were muddy at best about certain orthodox doctrine which caused many to question his foundational beliefs. Witness Lee brought the LC to the United States in 1962 after his mentor, Watchman Nee, began it in China. ![]() Most notably, the Christian Research Institute (CRI), which we respect, concluded that the LC was a "solid orthodox group of believers" after an initial evaluation labeled it an "aberrant Christian group." There have been decades of court proceedings, charges, counter-charges, and acrimony regarding the Local Church. We urge anyone interested in the LC to deeply research and pray at length before visiting. The LC, its publishing arm Living Stream, and Witness Lee are difficult to explain due to cultural differences, shifting statements, and apparent inconsistencies. NOTE: The Local Church Movement (LC) underwent a very long back and forth evaluation by the Christian Research Institute ( ) which first said the LC was not orthodox in its doctrine and teachings, and now says it is. Are the teachings of Witness Lee and the Local Church biblical?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |